Identify AI-assisted misconduct and unauthorized tools with browser-native integrity monitoring.
Flags ChatGPT extensions, Claude, and similar browser tools.
Detection runs locally — no video upload required.
Structured timelines for proportionate, contestable decisions.
Generative AI tools have changed assessment security. Candidates can access AI assistants via browser extensions, secondary devices, or remote sessions — often undetected by legacy proctoring that focuses on video recording rather than tool detection.
ProctorSafe monitors for AI-assisted misconduct through browser-native signals:
ChatGPT, Claude, and similar tools
TeamViewer, AnyDesk, and equivalents
unauthorized collaboration channels
navigation away from the assessment
requests to unauthorized domains
Unlike cloud-based proctoring that uploads full video for post-hoc analysis, ProctorSafe runs detection locally in the browser. This means:
Every detection event is logged with timestamps and severity. Reviewers access structured timelines and trust scores — supporting proportionate, contestable decisions aligned with your academic integrity policies.
Read our article on detecting generative AI cheating or request a demo.
Dive deeper with guides from our articles library.
Why webcam-only proctoring is no longer enough, and which integrity signals help against generative AI assistance.
Read articleTechnical architectureLatency, reliability, and privacy trade-offs between edge (on-device) and cloud-based proctoring architectures.
Read articlePedagogy & ethicsHow to design and operate proctoring that avoids biased outcomes, documents limitations, and keeps humans accountable.
Read articleCommon questions about privacy, compliance, and integration.
Request a demo to see how privacy-first proctoring fits your assessment workflow.