Online Exam Integrity
Protect the value of your credentials with secure, privacy-respecting remote assessment monitoring.
Timestamped, reviewable events — not hours of raw footage.
Prioritize reviewer time with severity-weighted decisions.
Automated signals support reviewers; they never replace them.
The integrity challenge in remote assessment
Online exams face growing threats: AI-assisted cheating tools, remote desktop software, screen sharing, and impersonation. Organizations need defensible integrity evidence without driving candidate anxiety or legal pushback.
Signal intelligence, not surveillance
ProctorSafe focuses on integrity signals — specific, reviewable events tied to your threat model:
- Face presence and identity verification
- Tab switching and window focus changes
- AI browser extension detection
- Remote desktop and screen sharing tools
- Suspicious network requests
Each signal is timestamped and available in a structured audit trail for human review.
Trust scores for scalable decisions
Not every flagged event requires manual review. ProctorSafe computes a trust score based on violation severity and session duration, helping teams:
- Auto-approve low-risk sessions
- Prioritize spot-checks for borderline cases
- Escalate high-risk sessions for full investigation
Human review remains central
Automated signals support reviewers — they do not replace them. Every flag is contestable, and your team retains full control over final decisions.
Privacy-respecting by design
Integrity monitoring does not require uploading hours of candidate video. Local processing keeps the candidate experience respectful while delivering the evidence your program needs.
Get started
Explore our interactive demo or request a demo for a walkthrough tailored to your assessment program.
Related reading
Dive deeper with guides from our articles library.
Building a Culture of Integrity: From Surveillance to Signal Intelligence
A modern integrity philosophy: extract only what matters, preserve dignity, and keep humans accountable for outcomes.
Read articleTechnical architectureSolving the Latency Gap: Why On-Device Analysis is Crucial for High-Stakes Exams
Why network dependency breaks fairness and how on-device monitoring keeps detection consistent under real-world connectivity.
Read articlePedagogy & ethicsReducing Test Anxiety: How Non-Invasive Monitoring Improves Performance
Why intrusive surveillance can harm outcomes, and how minimal, predictable monitoring supports fairness for learners.
Read articleFrequently Asked Questions
Common questions about privacy, compliance, and integration.
Ready to Get Started?
Request a demo to see how privacy-first proctoring fits your assessment workflow.